Since others seem to be doing it, I thought I’d post my planned ACUS 2005 schedule, now that I’ve had a chance to look over the tentative GM-only game book.
Slot 1 — I normally don’t play in this slot, mainly because I tend to be pretty beat after the drive to Livonia, but this year I’m tempted by immlass & mcroft‘s new Swan adventure. I mean, surely I can’t get killed by the team physician twice in a row, right?
Slot 2 — Probably Jack’s “Nine Lives in Amber,” even if he is going to be running it again at TBR. It sounds like it’ll be a lot of fun.
Slot 3 — GMing “Nine Losers in Akron”
Slot 4 — Playing in kit_kindred‘s “Ill Met in Amber”
Slot 5 — Co-GMing “The Mysterious Affair” with arcaedia
Slot 6 — Probably immlass & mcroft‘s “Equalizer”
Slot 7 — Playing in colomon‘s “Blaze of Glory.” This is probably the game I’m looking forward to the most.
Slot 8 — I think I’ll be continuing the tradition of taking this slot off.
It’s looking like it’ll be a fun con….
I mean, surely I can’t get killed by the team physician twice in a row, right?
You had to go and say that where they could see it. Well, it would tempt me. *g* And it’s really too bad that “The Mysterious Affair” isn’t the game you’re looking forward to the most, but then, “Blaze of Glory” is a *lot* of fun. *wink*
Looking forward to a game I’m running? That’d just be weird!
*BIG SHIT EATIN’ GRIN, HERE*
I mean, surely I can’t get killed by the team physician twice in a row, right?
*whistles innocently* Seriously, it’s not up to us. If we can convince to play, everybody is at risk!
I’m glad you’re interested in our games. I tend to worry that we won’t make.
I’m glad you’re interested in our games. I tend to worry that we won’t make.
Did this sentence die in mid-post? *grin*
No, actually “make” is the term we used at cons in Houston.
I won’t make = “my game won’t have enough players to actually be played at the con”.
Ah…okay. I’d never heard that one before.